Ken Paxton

Whistleblower lawsuit to continue despite AG Ken Paxton's concession

The attorney general’s office sought to force an end to the case, but a state district judge disagreed during a hearing in Austin

Attorney General Ken Paxton’s state pension is not in jeopardy, no matter how his impeachment trial turns out. Yanking pensions for misconduct in Texas is erratic because of a “hodgepodge” of conflicting rules, one ethics watchdog says. In Sept. 5 file photo, Paxton looks up at the gallery during the first day of his Senate impeachment trial.
Juan Figueroa / The Dallas Morning News

A whistleblower lawsuit against the Texas attorney general’s office will continue, a judge ruled Wednesday, raising the possibility that Attorney General Ken Paxton could be forced onto the witness stand in the future.

Paxton’s agency, in a bid to end the lawsuit, asked a state district judge in Travis County to impose a judgment in favor of the whistleblowers, saying it would not fight their lawsuit alleging that four top officials were improperly fired in 2020 after reporting Paxton to law enforcement.

During a hearing Wednesday, the judge rejected the request, siding with lawyers for the whistleblowers who argued that Paxton and his agency had not admitted guilt in the case and therefore could not be subject to a judgment.

The whistleblowers’ attorneys argue that the attorney general’s office is dropping its opposition to the lawsuit so Paxton can avoid being forced to answer questions under oath about firing the firings and accusations that the attorney general used his office to help an Austin real estate investor now under federal indictment.

Click here to read more on this report from our partners at The Dallas Morning News.

Contact Us